By Wojtek Kolan - April 13, 2025
Form
W W L W W L W L W L
Form
L L L L L L W L W LBased on the implied probability from the match winner, Nakashima has a 57.63% chance to get the victory.
PLEASE NOTE: Join the Matchstat.com tennis picks club to compare implied and actual predictions to discover value bets so you can win big.
| Prediction | Chance To Win |
|---|---|
| Brandon Nakashima | 57.63 % |
| Pedro Martinez Portero | 46.73 % |
|
Above is implied from odds. Login now to reveal our expert picks. |
Nakashima and Portero have played 5 sets against each other, with Nakashima winning 4 and Portero 1. Their last encounter was at the Aix En Provence Challenger on May 1, 2024, where Nakashima triumphed 3-6, 6-4, 6-4 on clay. Can Portero turn the tables in their next match?
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Brandon Nakashima | 2 |
| Pedro Martinez Portero | 0 |
| Nakashima | Stats | Portero |
|---|---|---|
| 55% (12-10) | YTD Win/Loss | 43% (9-12) |
| 2 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 31 | Ranking | 51 |
| 31 | Highest Rank | 36 |
| 23 | Age | 27 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 8 | Titles | 16 |
| 61% (238-150) | Career Total W/L | 60% (452-297) |
| $3,035,300 | Career Prize Money | $2,416,330 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
14 Apr 2025 / First
Brandon Nakashima implied favourite from odds → 57.63%
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3-6 6-4 6-4 |
Stats 
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Pedro Martinez Portero
56%
(
61 of
108)
1st Serve %
69%
(
68 of
99)
16
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
66%
(
40 of
61)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
40 of
68)
38%
(
18 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
46%
(
50 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
48 of
99)
106
Total Points Won
101
|
||||
| 6-3 6-4 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Pedro Martinez Portero
69%
(
38 of
55)
1st Serve %
73%
(
48 of
66)
10
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
34 of
48)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
16 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
28 of
66)
67
Total Points Won
54
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 27 | Games Won | 21 |
| 26 | Aces (Total) | 4 |
| 5 | Total Double Faults | 7 |
| 2:6:18 | Average Match Time | 2:6:18 |
| 61% (99/163) | 1st Serve % | 70% (116/165) |
| 71% (70/99) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (74/116) |
| 42% (27/64) | 2nd Serve Win % | 31% (15/49) |
| 45% (9/20) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (7/16) |
| 46% (76/165) | Return Points Win % | 40% (66/163) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
What happens when we delve deep into the stats of Brandon Nakashima and Pedro Portero’s tennis abilities? To begin with, let's scrutinize how they fare under the pressure of crucial second serves. Over the past six months, Nakashima has managed to win 48.01% of points on his second serve, whereas Portero trails behind with 40.93%. This difference is significant as experts often correlate second serve effectiveness with winning predictions.
Switching gears to return game stats, is it surprising to see Portero leading in returning second serve points with 46.81% compared to Nakashima’s 39.34%? When dissecting first serve returns, Portero also holds the edge with 26.98%, eclipsing Nakashima’s 21.51%. These statistics are essential indicators in anticipating victors when these two face off.
The art of saving breakpoints is another crucial aspect of tennis performance. Nakashima has faced this pressure better, saving 60.34% of breakpoints, while Portero has saved 54.71%. Here lies a gem for in-game betting as the ability to save crucial points often sways the outcome. In terms of converting breakpoint opportunities, Nakashima’s 36.49% proves superior to Portero’s 27.2%, shedding more light on potential in-match dynamics.
Analyzing their year-long performances, Nakashima has claimed victory in 59.76% of his matches while Portero’s win rate stands at 42.86%. Yet, every player has a favored battleground; for Nakashima, it’s indoor hard courts (70% win rate), while Portero finds comfort on clay (65%). Their respective weaknesses also differ, with Nakashima struggling on clay and Portero on grass.
With both players spending the year mostly on the Main tour, Nakashima has achieved a higher win percentage at 52.78%, compared to Portero’s 43.75%. Despite Nakashima facing competitors with an average ranking of 91.02, compared to Portero's 93.32, he maintains a superior head-to-head score, having been victorious twice against Portero with no losses.
Looking at past encounters, these players have met only twice, with Nakashima victorious both times. The previous clash at the Aix En Provence Challenger saw Nakashima triumphing, showcasing his capacity to win under different conditions. The average match duration suggests tightly contested battles, adding anticipation should they meet again.
In deciding set scenarios, Nakashima again appears formidable, winning 63% of such sets in the last year, compared to Portero's 48%. Moreover, their encounters have yet to see tiebreaks, but if a deciding set appears, the odds seem to favor Nakashima. With these insights, Nakashima emerges as the likely favorite to clinch the victory in their upcoming duel.
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Roberto Bautista Agut
Player
Brandon Nakashima
72%
(
42 of
58)
1st Serve %
66%
(
35 of
53)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
19 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
27 of
53)
66
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Christopher Eubanks
57%
(
30 of
53)
1st Serve %
75%
(
49 of
65)
7
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
35 of
49)
74%
(
17 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
13 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
22 of
65)
62
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Frances Tiafoe
Player
Brandon Nakashima
60%
(
36 of
60)
1st Serve %
65%
(
53 of
81)
4
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
1
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
37%
(
22 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
39 of
81)
77
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Mackenzie Mcdonald
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve %
67%
(
41 of
61)
7
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
1
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
82%
(
14 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
9 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
61)
66
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R4 |
Stats
Grigor Dimitrov
Player
Brandon Nakashima
70%
(
40 of
57)
1st Serve %
67%
(
36 of
54)
12
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
1
83%
(
33 of
40)
1st Serve Won
92%
(
33 of
36)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
13 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
26%
(
14 of
54)
58
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
David Goffin
67%
(
63 of
94)
1st Serve %
56%
(
56 of
100)
13
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
5
84%
(
53 of
63)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
43 of
56)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
18 of
44)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
28%
(
26 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
39 of
100)
107
Total Points Won
87
|
6-3 6-7(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Roberto Carballes Baena
68%
(
69 of
101)
1st Serve %
56%
(
48 of
86)
14
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
1
75%
(
52 of
69)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
35 of
48)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
35%
(
35 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
33 of
86)
99
Total Points Won
88
|
6-4 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R4 |
Stats
Ben Shelton
Player
Brandon Nakashima
66%
(
40 of
61)
1st Serve %
48%
(
30 of
62)
6
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
18 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
27 of
62)
70
Total Points Won
53
|
7-6(6) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Matteo Arnaldi
60%
(
27 of
45)
1st Serve %
57%
(
32 of
56)
4
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
5
89%
(
24 of
27)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
23 of
32)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
18%
(
8 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
24 of
56)
61
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Rinky Hijikata
61%
(
43 of
71)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
63)
14
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
0
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
32%
(
23 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
63)
76
Total Points Won
58
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Nuno Borges
Player
Pedro Martinez Portero
59%
(
67 of
113)
1st Serve %
71%
(
94 of
132)
10
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
5
67%
(
45 of
67)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
57 of
94)
57%
(
26 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
29%
(
5 of
17)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
37%
(
42 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
55 of
132)
126
Total Points Won
119
|
7-5 6-7(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Pedro Martinez Portero
Player
Lorenzo Sonego
77%
(
51 of
66)
1st Serve %
61%
(
53 of
87)
0
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
4
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
41 of
53)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
12 of
34)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
23 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
34 of
87)
77
Total Points Won
76
|
6-4 1-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Damir Dzumhur
Player
Pedro Martinez Portero
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve %
69%
(
22 of
32)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
65%
(
17 of
26)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
38%
(
15 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
45
Total Points Won
27
|
6-1 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Pedro Martinez Portero
Player
Stan Wawrinka
80%
(
80 of
100)
1st Serve %
57%
(
55 of
97)
0
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
3
60%
(
48 of
80)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
39%
(
39 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
45 of
97)
106
Total Points Won
91
|
4-6 7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Luciano Darderi
Player
Pedro Martinez Portero
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve %
54%
(
22 of
41)
6
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
97%
(
30 of
31)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
14 of
22)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
16%
(
7 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
16 of
41)
52
Total Points Won
32
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Corentin Moutet
Player
Pedro Martinez Portero
55%
(
32 of
58)
1st Serve %
64%
(
42 of
66)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
66%
(
21 of
32)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
40%
(
23 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
33 of
66)
68
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Fabian Marozsan
Player
Pedro Martinez Portero
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve %
63%
(
31 of
49)
10
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
80%
(
12 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
20%
(
9 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
22 of
49)
59
Total Points Won
36
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Laslo Djere
Player
Pedro Martinez Portero
71%
(
39 of
55)
1st Serve %
72%
(
41 of
57)
13
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
85%
(
33 of
39)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
27%
(
15 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
28 of
57)
68
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Pedro Martinez Portero
70%
(
67 of
96)
1st Serve %
78%
(
59 of
76)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
69%
(
46 of
67)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
35 of
59)
34%
(
10 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
42%
(
40 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
76)
90
Total Points Won
82
|
4-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Francisco Cerundolo
Player
Pedro Martinez Portero
71%
(
46 of
65)
1st Serve %
73%
(
44 of
60)
8
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
10 of
16)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
32%
(
21 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
25 of
60)
69
Total Points Won
56
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Nakashima Vs Portero is now available here.
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 52% (31/29) | Win/Loss | 65% (359/195) |
| 52% (78/72) | Sets Win/Loss | 61% (794/500) |
| 51% (770/748) | Games Win/Loss | 55% (6568/5452) |
| 0.42 | Aces Per Game | 0.11 |
| 315 | Aces Total | 632 |
| 0.16 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.31 |
| 122 | Total Double Faults | 1827 |
| 1:58:50 | Average Match Time | 1:37:31 |
| 207.02 | Average Opponent Rank | 432.56 |
| 62% (2927/4730) | 1st Serve % | 66% (22329/33846) |
| 70% (2056/2927) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (14488/22329) |
| 52% (937/1803) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (5584/11521) |
| 38% (169/445) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 46% (1899/4173) |
| 39% (1905/4912) | Return Points Win % | 44% (15228/34400) |
| 52% (28/54) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 65% (346/530) |
| 50% (3/6) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 45% (5/11) |
| 53% (19/36) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 54% (76/141) |
| 45% (9/20) | Deciding Set Win % | 57% (106/185) |
| 79% (34/27) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (354/306) |
| 21% (34/7) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (354/47) |
| 15% (26/4) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 26% (200/52) |
View full predicted draw for Nakashima in Barcelona
View full predicted draw for Portero in Barcelona
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
View Draw
